20.7.11

Fail

The state of Florida has started requiring that recipients of welfare benefits in that state submit to drug testing before they are able to receive their entitlements. This law impacts new applicants for the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, who incur the cost of these drug tests, and are reimbursed only if they pass.

Despite the fact that this new bill is questionable at best in its constitutionality, it is highly discriminatory, based on the presumption that poor people in need of benefits are likely to be drug users. This is purely a stereotype, as a 2001 pilot testing study in Florida found no significant difference in drug use among aid recipients. And in a state where the unemployment rate is among the highest in the country, the government is compromising the ability of families to survive by failing to provide a valid harm reduction model.

Consider the children who are impacted by this new law. If a parent is denied their welfare checks because of a failed drug test, which has now cost the family up to $70 of crucial funds, where will money for the child's food and clothing come from? For their educational materials? Under the law, a parent is supposed to be able to name another adult who can receive benefits on behalf of their child. But in an environment where support is low and resources are limited, this answer may become more of a problem than it is a solution.

It seems as if the agenda of this new law aims more to deter families from applying for benefits than it does to deter drug use. In the absence of a drug therapy or rehabilitation program to accompany the testing subjection, what choices will a despondent parent have to support their family and get back on their feet? If drug use was actually a critical concern of the Florida government, the position of these individuals would be considered before applying such a harsh invasion into their privacy.

2 comments:

  1. Super well-put, Tasha. Rick Scott, our governor, proposed this law and didn't disclose that he owned part of a company that would be contracted to do the tests. It's disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'd like to add a big shame-on-you to Kentucky and Missouri for imposing the same rules, as well as all of those people who complain that this is "only fair" because those who WORK for their money are subjected to drug testing. It's not the same, people. Your employers have a stake in your physical and emotional stability, and they use funds from their own budgets to test you. Testing poor people and expecting tax payers to cover the cost IS unconstitutional, no matter how much you want to say that it's not.

    ReplyDelete